One of the issues I have been mulling over in my mind since
Troy’s discussions is the feasibility of convincing those who do not yet accept
climate change. Much of Troy’s scientific presentation was review for me, and
the basics of global climatic heating have been around for thirty years and
more. Given all of this time that has been spent trying to convince recalcitrant
climate change deniers, with denial still fairly strong in the United States, does it make sense to
continually try to persuade these deniers?
My answer is no. At this point, from my perspective, climate
change deniers have reasons that logical argument and scientific facts will not
overcome. From where I stand, the two major reasons for continuing climate
change denial are ideological and economic. Those with an ideological bias
against recognizing ACC have a problem with the solutions, which include
government intervention in energy and renewables markets, carbon taxes, etc. As
they find any government intervention in economics abhorrent, they will deny up
and down that there is any need for increased regulations. From the economic
side, there are people whose incomes, some of them very high, are dependent on
the fossil fuels industry. When it means literally taking food out of their
mouths, even for the benefit of the many, or the greater good, it is exceedingly
unlikely that these deniers will come around.
So, this means that continually investing in public
education of adult ideological/economic climate change deniers is probably a waste of money and time. All of
the preceding does not include children in schools, who may not have the
ideological and economic biases that act as barriers to accepting science. In
my view, it seems more effective to go directly to educated, responsible
policymakers and lobby them for implementation of effective policies. These
policies include carbon taxes, increased public investment in renewable energy,
and changes in government subsidy structures to favor renewable energy
industries instead of fossil fuels as well as increased individual tax
incentives and subsidies to convert homes, businesses and the automobile fleet
into renewable energy consumers.
Thanks, John, I'm in now. These posts are excellent--I particularly like your applications of what you learn each week onto broader societal issues, and your smart critiques of some of the gaps you're finding in people's work.
ReplyDelete